Update On Proposed Rule On Hexavalent Chromium

Words: Dan KesterWhile OSHA appears to be on track to finalize its standard on occupational exposures to hexavalent chromium by January 18, 2006, there remains a great deal of concern about the proposed PEL (permissible exposure limit). The level proposed is so low (1 microgram per cubic meter) that many businesses have made it clear to OSHA that they will probably close their doors rather than spend money to upgrade their facilities only to find out that the new technologies don't help them achieve the PEL. The proposed level is 50 times more stringent than the current standard and 50 times more stringent than the exposure limits of our major trading partners in Europe and Asia.

In an effort to bring these concerns to the forefront before the rule is finalized, Congressman John Boehner, Chairman of the House Ed and Workforce Committee and Congressman Charlie Norwood, Chairman of the Workforce Protections Subcommittee, sent a letter to Josh Bolton, head of the Office of Management and Budget asking that the agency thoroughly examine all the scientific evidence presented on the standard. Apparently recent analyses submitted to OSHA during the comment period suggest that the agency failed to include whole industry sectors with many small businesses in its assessment of the proposed rule.

A letter (spearheaded by Senator Kit Bond (R-MO)) and being circulated for signatures of other Senators will also be sent to Labor Secretary Chao asking her to insure that OSHA fully assesses the technological feasibility of the proposed limit and the potential adverse consequences of the rule on American jobs and competitiveness.

By some estimates, the cost to the U.S. economy for a PEL this low will easily exceed $3 billion annually - far greater than OSHA's estimated cost of $220 million and could make this rule one of the most expensive federal regulations in years.

This is an important issue for our industry because of the potential precedent the rule could set for silica.

About: Featured Legislative
 0
The Evolution and Innovation of Concrete Unit Pavers
May 2025

When concrete unit pavers were first produced in Europe after the second World War, they were used as a replacement for clay brick pavers due to a lack of raw materials needed to produce that product. The primary emphasis was function with little to no co

Brandi Sauers
Featured MAP Partner
Read More
The Evolution and Innovation of Concrete Unit Pavers
May 2025

When concrete unit pavers were first produced in Europe after the second World War, they were used as a replacement for clay brick pavers due to a lack of raw materials needed to produce that product. The primary emphasis was function with little to no co

Brandi Sauers
Featured MAP Partner
Read More
Masonry Mortar: The Right Type for the Job
May 2025

When it comes to masonry construction, mortar is much more than “glue” that holds everything together — it’s a critical component of wall performance, longevity, and aesthetics. It can “make it or break it”. Whether you’re laying a foundation CMU wall or

Garen Graves
Featured MAP Partner
Mortar
Read More
MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Episode 20 Recap: Mark Kemp, Superior Masonry
May 2025

On this episode of the MASONRY STRONG Podcast, Mark Kemp joins the set to talk about his esteemed career in masonry, how his passion stayed strong throughout the years, and how retirement has been treating him.

Justin Stengel
Read More